As a fellow XinjaBrett - I have no issues with the concept of BrettStash 
Get Stashing! đ° With a 2.25% interest rate
Hi There,
One thing to consider is that the requested additional direct debit feature in a stand alone transaction acct is kind of either out in the marketplace or has been tried before.
IE One of the first direct banks offered an investment builder acct. (Ok interest rate) with direct debits and bill pay turned on and a high interest transaction account (eAsysaver)
The former died out while the latter lives on albeit with another name.
The Stash account is a pretty good feature and Iâm thinking your original thought to make customers think twice before direct debiting is bang on the money.
The differentiator might be to empower your customers to handle their high interest savings and every day transactions with inbuilt budgeting that âcouldâ start to predict when to transfer funds stashed funds to your everyday acct.
Automated sweeps are one way of doing that but hey others are already doing that right? And people are quick to complain when the âautomationâ fails them.
But, inbuilt user driven budgeting inside a banking app is not so common. Imagine how many use cases you get then because customers are driving it themselves.
Finally, I have an offset account and use it to pay my bills. If I want to save for something I would look for a high interest savings account and for everyday discretionary spending Iâd like to use my Xinja MC. So the release of Stash has plugged a banking gap for me at the moment.
Naive questionâŚ
Yes, keep a stash account separate from the transaction account.
But why canât we earn 2.25% on BOTH accounts?
Surely this is better than complicating a âmove it out of sightâ stash account with some (but not all) features of a transaction account?
(Xinja earns every time I make a payment with my card, after all)
Still keen to get a response to my now buried up the list question eg what does Xinja do with the cash ? What does Xinja earn on it vs what it pays out ( I assume itâs a loss for now). Thanks.
Loving the simplicity and the rate of Stash. Personally happy to have DD disabled on Stash. Itâs a good security feature. Not fussed about no interest on the standard bank account as I basically plan to maintain a zero balance. Stash is king!
@CaptainXinja Just to clarify my thoughts on what Xinja is proposing at this stage. It sounds like there will be three accounts: (i) a single zero interest transaction account; (ii) a single high interest Stashâ account, with multiple buckets; (iii) and a single Billstash account, with interest rate yet to be determined.
Questions:
- Will the interest paid into the Stash account be be paid into each bucket on a pro-rata basis?
- Will there be multiple buckets available within the Billstash account? If âNoâ, this would significantly lower my interest in using a Billstash account. If âYesâ, how would you identify the bucket from which a particular direct or scheduled payment should be paid.
- Will it be possible to transfer money from a stash account to a Billstash account/bucket?
HI @James1. Youâre correct - that is the plan. Answering your questions
- Yes - interest will be distributed pro rata
- No there wonât. Direct debits that pull obviously would only pull from the bsb and account number level so we canât control. If we allowed people to define which bucket a direct debit should come from, then we could in theory connect a specific DD to a specific bucket, but we need to allow for DDs that the customer sets up and doesnât define (do we just pull payment from each bill bucket equally etc?). This is why we couldnât do it thru multi stash. In parallel we will be working on categorisation and insights so youâll be able to look at your bill account by merchant or category (eg: housing, utilities, insurance etc.).
- Youâve got me on that last one - pretty sure you can go from stash to bill but need to confirm that and find out whether you can move from mini stash to bill! Will post again when I know - it might not be defined yet.
@CaptainXinja In response to point 2. Would it be possible, once categorisation and merchant identification is available, to link a specific merchant or category to a bucket?
@CaptainXinja Given the answer to @James1 second question, do you have a lead time on multiple billstashes? You probably donât as yet, but just putting it out there again that there is a use case for multiple so hopefully it can be put on the agenda.
Cheers,
Brett
Hi @Kain! Not in the bills account as weâre not planning to have buckets within that, but rather weâre planning to be able to proactively say (based on your transaction account) âThis payment looks like a billâ (ie once weâve got enough data to say itâs a regular payment of similar amount) - âdo you want to pay that out of your bills account?â. Also, weâll have insights and categorisation so youâll be able to see how much you spend on a category like âutilitiesâ âhomeloanâ or âcar insuranceâ in any one month.
Hi Brett - actually - as per my comment to @James1 - weâre not planning to do multi stashes within bills, unless we can see a way around the direct debit issue, without multiple bill accounts. A direct debit canât identify a virtual account - it can only identify a bsb and account number. We havenât solutioned the bills account yet - weâre focused on scheduled payments and transfers and multi stash at present in this area but they are all highly related and the aim was to deliver in quick succession. Still aiming for this quarter for multi stash but itâs looking tightâŚ
@James1 just to update you - yes we will be able to move from stash to bills account directly and vice versa. That includes from mini stash to bills.
Hi @CaptainXinja, thanks for the reply. Sorry, misunderstanding. I didnât mean multiple buckets in a single bills stash, I meant multiple bill stashes each with its own BSB and account number. Cheers, Brett
@CaptainXinja Thanks for your quick responses. I believe that @brett and I both would like to see the eventual introduction of multiple Billstash accounts, each with its own account number, which would enable specific direct debits and scheduled payments to be paid directly from those accounts, it seems unlikely that Xinja will consider their introduction, at least in the near future.
However, the ability to make direct transfers from a mini Stash to the Billstash may allow for a possible workaround. Funds for specific purposes (including direct debits) could be stored in individual miniStash accounts, then automatically transferred to the Billstash account on the same day (or in my case more likely the day before) the direct debit is drawn from the Billstash account.
This would still be clunkier and less efficient (from the clientâs perspective) than allowing direct debits and scheduled payments to be permitted directly from a miniStash account. It would also be essential for Xinja to ensure that its systems are sufficiently robust so as to ensure that scheduled transfers from a miniStash account to the Billstash account take place before the direct debit from the Billstash account is effected; which is the main reason that I would prefer to schedule both activities on consecutive days rather than the same day.
any timeline for this much awaited feature? 
Hey Rob, is this in regards to Stash or the multiple stash accounts?
In regards to Stash account it is already out! As for the multiple stash accounts it is likely going to be delivered in this quarter (Jan-March) as seen by the road map here: Road Map
Hey @brett wasnât sure as he wasnât replaying in particular to the bill stash or just the topic in general. Bit of ambiguity there but thought I would try and help
Hey @contact.rob, we will be rolling out multi stash first, then a bills account. Per the roadmap https://trello.com/b/DvScpL4o/xinja-roadmap. multi will be this quarter, then bills soon after that.
Weâll update the roadmap once we have a clearer timeline 
